<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 185 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240520</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80HHC. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence of export and receipt of foreign exchange, justifying the deduction. The requirement of customs clearance was deemed not strictly necessary for intellectual property rights like music rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:45:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 185 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240520</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 80HHC. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence of export and receipt of foreign exchange, justifying the deduction. The requirement of customs clearance was deemed not strictly necessary for intellectual property rights like music rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>