<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 182 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision in a case involving the interpretation of section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute centered on computing taxable profit under section 144 for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation of income did not warrant further disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source, as the expenditures were allowable based on the income estimation. The decision clarified the application of section 40(a)(ia) and emphasized the significance of legal precedents in tax treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 182 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision in a case involving the interpretation of section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The dispute centered on computing taxable profit under section 144 for the assessment year 2008-09. The Tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimation of income did not warrant further disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source, as the expenditures were allowable based on the income estimation. The decision clarified the application of section 40(a)(ia) and emphasized the significance of legal precedents in tax treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>