<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 560 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159943</link>
    <description>A judicial declaration that additional sales tax is chargeable states the law as it always stood, rather than creating a new rule prospectively. On that basis, where the tax had escaped assessment after the Supreme Court&#039;s declaration, reassessment under section 19(1) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was valid. The assessing officer was therefore justified in initiating reassessment proceedings, and the challenge to the reassessment failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 17:34:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 560 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159943</link>
      <description>A judicial declaration that additional sales tax is chargeable states the law as it always stood, rather than creating a new rule prospectively. On that basis, where the tax had escaped assessment after the Supreme Court&#039;s declaration, reassessment under section 19(1) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 was valid. The assessing officer was therefore justified in initiating reassessment proceedings, and the challenge to the reassessment failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>