<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 622 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159926</link>
    <description>A revision before the High Court was not maintainable against an order passed by the Tribunal under section 11(8) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 because the statutory revisional scheme extended only to Tribunal orders under section 10. Since the challenged order fell outside the revisional field, the filing could not be entertained and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 622 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159926</link>
      <description>A revision before the High Court was not maintainable against an order passed by the Tribunal under section 11(8) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 because the statutory revisional scheme extended only to Tribunal orders under section 10. Since the challenged order fell outside the revisional field, the filing could not be entertained and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>