https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240495 Writ jurisdiction was declined where the challenge to MVAT assessment orders and demand notices turned on disputed questions of fact, including service of notice, appearance before the assessing authority and merits of the assessments. The proper remedy was held to be the statutory appellate process, rather than examination of the factual controversies in writ proceedings. To avoid prejudice from delay, the appellate authority was directed to entertain appeals filed within the specified period and consider all contentions without rejecting them on limitation. Interim protection was continued against enforcement of the impugned demand notices until the appeals were decided. en-us Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:01:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240495 Writ jurisdiction was declined where the challenge to MVAT assessment orders and demand notices turned on disputed questions of fact, including service of notice, appearance before the assessing authority and merits of the assessments. The proper remedy was held to be the statutory appellate process, rather than examination of the factual controversies in writ proceedings. To avoid prejudice from delay, the appellate authority was directed to entertain appeals filed within the specified period and consider all contentions without rejecting them on limitation. Interim protection was continued against enforcement of the impugned demand notices until the appeals were decided. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240495