<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 158 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240493</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application to condone a 172-day delay in filing the appeal, citing gross negligence and inaction on the appellant&#039;s part. The appeal, along with the stay application, was dismissed. The judgment emphasized the significance of timely compliance with procedural requirements in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 158 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240493</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application to condone a 172-day delay in filing the appeal, citing gross negligence and inaction on the appellant&#039;s part. The appeal, along with the stay application, was dismissed. The judgment emphasized the significance of timely compliance with procedural requirements in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>