<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 142 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240477</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s exercise of revisionary powers under Section 263. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the Assessing Officer&#039;s initial assessment lacked proper application of mind, justifying the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of taxing the gain on foreign exchange under the Tonnage Tax Scheme and directed further examination of the disallowance of gratuity and expenses for FCCBs. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on these issues, stating no legal element was involved in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 142 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240477</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s exercise of revisionary powers under Section 263. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the Assessing Officer&#039;s initial assessment lacked proper application of mind, justifying the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of taxing the gain on foreign exchange under the Tonnage Tax Scheme and directed further examination of the disallowance of gratuity and expenses for FCCBs. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on these issues, stating no legal element was involved in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>