<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s contentions in various issues, including excluding certain comparables in transfer pricing adjustment, deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for TDS, and allowing deduction of interest paid to SEBI. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of penalty paid to the stock exchange as compensatory and directed verification of STT collected for potential double taxation. The decisions were based on detailed analysis of facts and legal precedents, ensuring compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s contentions in various issues, including excluding certain comparables in transfer pricing adjustment, deleting disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for TDS, and allowing deduction of interest paid to SEBI. The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of penalty paid to the stock exchange as compensatory and directed verification of STT collected for potential double taxation. The decisions were based on detailed analysis of facts and legal precedents, ensuring compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>