<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 127 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source on reimbursements to the holding company. The issue of rent disallowance was remitted back to the CIT(A), while the disallowance of prior period expenses was upheld. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to consider the prior period expenses for the preceding assessment year if disallowed in the current year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 07:57:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 127 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source on reimbursements to the holding company. The issue of rent disallowance was remitted back to the CIT(A), while the disallowance of prior period expenses was upheld. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to consider the prior period expenses for the preceding assessment year if disallowed in the current year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>