<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 116 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240451</link>
    <description>Use of the mark and domain names containing &quot;AMEX&quot; was found to infringe the plaintiffs&#039; registered trade marks and to amount to passing off, because the plaintiffs had prior registration, substantial use, reputation, and internet presence, while the defendants operated in the same financial services field and used the impugned mark in a confusing and deceptive manner. Unrebutted evidence, including actual confusion, supported the finding of liability under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Injunctive relief was granted, and damages were awarded to deter deceptive adoption and protect the plaintiffs&#039; statutory and goodwill-based rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 07:55:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 116 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240451</link>
      <description>Use of the mark and domain names containing &quot;AMEX&quot; was found to infringe the plaintiffs&#039; registered trade marks and to amount to passing off, because the plaintiffs had prior registration, substantial use, reputation, and internet presence, while the defendants operated in the same financial services field and used the impugned mark in a confusing and deceptive manner. Unrebutted evidence, including actual confusion, supported the finding of liability under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Injunctive relief was granted, and damages were awarded to deter deceptive adoption and protect the plaintiffs&#039; statutory and goodwill-based rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>