<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 108 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240443</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the order confirming the demand of duty and penalties against the appellant in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of final products based on bailing slips. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence to support such allegations and found that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient corroborating evidence linking the appellant to the alleged misconduct. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant due to the lack of substantial evidence connecting them to the clandestine removal, providing consequential relief by overturning the imposition of penalties and confirming the demand of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 108 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240443</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the order confirming the demand of duty and penalties against the appellant in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of final products based on bailing slips. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence to support such allegations and found that the Revenue failed to provide sufficient corroborating evidence linking the appellant to the alleged misconduct. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant due to the lack of substantial evidence connecting them to the clandestine removal, providing consequential relief by overturning the imposition of penalties and confirming the demand of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>