<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 94 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240429</link>
    <description>Imported zircon sand was considered in relation to eligibility for Notification No. 04/2006-CE and the liability to countervailing duty. The Tribunal treated the issue as identical to one already decided in an earlier order, found the material facts and question to be the same, and followed that prior view. On that basis, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 94 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240429</link>
      <description>Imported zircon sand was considered in relation to eligibility for Notification No. 04/2006-CE and the liability to countervailing duty. The Tribunal treated the issue as identical to one already decided in an earlier order, found the material facts and question to be the same, and followed that prior view. On that basis, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>