https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240423 Section 66 of the Competition Act, 2002 preserved pending MRTP proceedings for decision under the repealed regime, but it did not exclude the appellate remedy under Section 53T. The right of appeal was treated as a substantive statutory right, and Section 53T was read broadly to cover any decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal, including orders in transferred MRTP matters. Because an efficacious statutory appeal was available, writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 was held to be unavailable. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable and the petitioners were required to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240423 Section 66 of the Competition Act, 2002 preserved pending MRTP proceedings for decision under the repealed regime, but it did not exclude the appellate remedy under Section 53T. The right of appeal was treated as a substantive statutory right, and Section 53T was read broadly to cover any decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal, including orders in transferred MRTP matters. Because an efficacious statutory appeal was available, writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 was held to be unavailable. The writ petitions were therefore not maintainable and the petitioners were required to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws Law of Competition Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240423