https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240418 The Tribunal held that the appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. The goods were not eligible for exemption under this notification post the issuance of Notification No. 44/93-C.E., which fully exempted ship breaking materials. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument and upheld the duty confirmation for clearances made from April 1993 to February 1994 under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. The Tribunal dismissed the applications, finding no apparent mistake in the records. en-us Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:02:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240418 The Tribunal held that the appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 202/88-C.E. The goods were not eligible for exemption under this notification post the issuance of Notification No. 44/93-C.E., which fully exempted ship breaking materials. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument and upheld the duty confirmation for clearances made from April 1993 to February 1994 under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. The Tribunal dismissed the applications, finding no apparent mistake in the records. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240418