<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 76 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240411</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the central excise appeal, emphasizing compliance with registration and duty payment requirements. The Court found no substantial question of law for consideration, refraining from interference due to substantial relief granted. The time for deposit was extended, stressing compliance by the specified date. The judgment underscores the importance of evidence in countering deeming provisions and adherence to excise regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 76 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240411</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the central excise appeal, emphasizing compliance with registration and duty payment requirements. The Court found no substantial question of law for consideration, refraining from interference due to substantial relief granted. The time for deposit was extended, stressing compliance by the specified date. The judgment underscores the importance of evidence in countering deeming provisions and adherence to excise regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>