<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 589 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159916</link>
    <description>Interest under section 24(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act accrued automatically when tax remained unpaid after the statutory due date, and later filing of revised or supplementary returns did not erase the earlier default. The same interest mechanism applied to additional sales tax, surcharge, and works contract liabilities, including liabilities validated retrospectively, because the underlying tax obligation and recovery machinery stood attracted from the relevant date. A revisional order passed without affording the dealer a personal hearing was procedurally defective and was set aside for fresh disposal after hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:45:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 589 - TAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIAL TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159916</link>
      <description>Interest under section 24(3) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act accrued automatically when tax remained unpaid after the statutory due date, and later filing of revised or supplementary returns did not erase the earlier default. The same interest mechanism applied to additional sales tax, surcharge, and works contract liabilities, including liabilities validated retrospectively, because the underlying tax obligation and recovery machinery stood attracted from the relevant date. A revisional order passed without affording the dealer a personal hearing was procedurally defective and was set aside for fresh disposal after hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>