<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 300 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159910</link>
    <description>State excise duty under Entry 51 of List II extends only to alcoholic liquor for human consumption, so it cannot be levied on raw material, intermediate products, or manufacturing losses before the final potable product emerges. On that basis, wastage after distillation but before dilution, obscuration losses, and pipeline loss during manufacture of IMFL fall outside the charging power. Excise rules may regulate levy only within the Constitution and the parent statute, and cannot enlarge the taxable base. The levy was therefore invalid to that extent, while the challenge failed on the issue governed by the earlier binding decision on wastage of IMFL exported outside the State.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 300 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159910</link>
      <description>State excise duty under Entry 51 of List II extends only to alcoholic liquor for human consumption, so it cannot be levied on raw material, intermediate products, or manufacturing losses before the final potable product emerges. On that basis, wastage after distillation but before dilution, obscuration losses, and pipeline loss during manufacture of IMFL fall outside the charging power. Excise rules may regulate levy only within the Constitution and the parent statute, and cannot enlarge the taxable base. The levy was therefore invalid to that extent, while the challenge failed on the issue governed by the earlier binding decision on wastage of IMFL exported outside the State.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>