<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 519 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159908</link>
    <description>Penalty for contravention of the transit/form requirement under the U.P. Sales Tax Act is not justified on a mere technical breach. Where the goods were supported by an eligibility certificate, recorded in the assessee&#039;s books, tax had been paid, and the incorrect document description was found to be a bona fide mistake by the clearing agent, the absence of mala fides and of any intention to evade assessment or tax payment meant that only a nominal penalty could be sustained. The Tribunal&#039;s factual finding on lack of intent to evade was not shown to be perverse, so the reduction of penalty to a token amount was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:58:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 519 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159908</link>
      <description>Penalty for contravention of the transit/form requirement under the U.P. Sales Tax Act is not justified on a mere technical breach. Where the goods were supported by an eligibility certificate, recorded in the assessee&#039;s books, tax had been paid, and the incorrect document description was found to be a bona fide mistake by the clearing agent, the absence of mala fides and of any intention to evade assessment or tax payment meant that only a nominal penalty could be sustained. The Tribunal&#039;s factual finding on lack of intent to evade was not shown to be perverse, so the reduction of penalty to a token amount was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>