<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 588 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159905</link>
    <description>Rice supplied under the Andhra Pradesh Rice Procurement (Levy) Order, 1984 was treated as a sale, not compulsory acquisition, because the scheme did not wholly exclude mutual assent. The Court noted that while procurement price and mandatory supply obligations were fixed, the order still allowed dispute over the analyst&#039;s report, re-analysis of samples, final price adjustment, delivery terms, incidental charges, packing, classification, quality specifications, and rejection of non-conforming rice. Because some real scope for agreement remained, even on limited matters, the turnover fell within the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 and was taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 588 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159905</link>
      <description>Rice supplied under the Andhra Pradesh Rice Procurement (Levy) Order, 1984 was treated as a sale, not compulsory acquisition, because the scheme did not wholly exclude mutual assent. The Court noted that while procurement price and mandatory supply obligations were fixed, the order still allowed dispute over the analyst&#039;s report, re-analysis of samples, final price adjustment, delivery terms, incidental charges, packing, classification, quality specifications, and rejection of non-conforming rice. Because some real scope for agreement remained, even on limited matters, the turnover fell within the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 and was taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>