https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159895 Identical reference questions already decided in an earlier Division Bench ruling were treated as concluded after the Revenue's special leave challenge was dismissed. The later Supreme Court decision did not justify reopening the reference or answering it afresh on the same subject-matter. The Court therefore declined to disturb the prior determination and indicated that the Revenue could pursue any other remedy available in law. The reference was answered consistently with the earlier decision, preserving finality where the issues and factual setting were the same. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:50:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159895 Identical reference questions already decided in an earlier Division Bench ruling were treated as concluded after the Revenue's special leave challenge was dismissed. The later Supreme Court decision did not justify reopening the reference or answering it afresh on the same subject-matter. The Court therefore declined to disturb the prior determination and indicated that the Revenue could pursue any other remedy available in law. The reference was answered consistently with the earlier decision, preserving finality where the issues and factual setting were the same. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159895