<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 552 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159894</link>
    <description>A temporary sales tax exemption on wheat and wheat products ceased once the Act was amended to insert the relevant entry in the Fifth Schedule, because the notification was intended only as an interim measure until statutory amendment took effect. The later retrospective corrigendum did not revive the earlier notification; it operated only through the separate corrigendum mechanism. A fresh exemption notification issued under section 8-A(1) and cancelled under section 8-A(3) was also held valid, because section 8-A(2A) regulates transposition or alteration of levy and does not bar cancellation and re-issuance of exemptions. The writ petitions challenging the exemption notifications were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 552 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159894</link>
      <description>A temporary sales tax exemption on wheat and wheat products ceased once the Act was amended to insert the relevant entry in the Fifth Schedule, because the notification was intended only as an interim measure until statutory amendment took effect. The later retrospective corrigendum did not revive the earlier notification; it operated only through the separate corrigendum mechanism. A fresh exemption notification issued under section 8-A(1) and cancelled under section 8-A(3) was also held valid, because section 8-A(2A) regulates transposition or alteration of levy and does not bar cancellation and re-issuance of exemptions. The writ petitions challenging the exemption notifications were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>