<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 619 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159893</link>
    <description>Mixing methyl alcohol with distilled water in a fixed proportion and at a specified temperature for aviation use produced a product with a distinct commercial identity and specialised use. Because the resulting water-methanol mixture was not suitable for ordinary purposes and had a different nature, character and market identity from the original input, it was treated as a new commercial commodity. The process therefore fell within the wide meaning of manufacture under section 2(e-1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The item was held taxable as an unclassified good rather than as methyl alcohol, and the assessee succeeded on classification and tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 16:43:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 619 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159893</link>
      <description>Mixing methyl alcohol with distilled water in a fixed proportion and at a specified temperature for aviation use produced a product with a distinct commercial identity and specialised use. Because the resulting water-methanol mixture was not suitable for ordinary purposes and had a different nature, character and market identity from the original input, it was treated as a new commercial commodity. The process therefore fell within the wide meaning of manufacture under section 2(e-1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The item was held taxable as an unclassified good rather than as methyl alcohol, and the assessee succeeded on classification and tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>