<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 494 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159880</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, overturning the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court held that the exclusion of turnover value for the assessment year 1980-81 was justified as the transactions constituted second sales in the course of inter-State trade. Emphasizing the importance of the movement of goods across States, the Court clarified that the actual transfer of property need not occur in the same State. The petitioner&#039;s entitlement to exemption under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act for the second sale was upheld, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision being set aside with no costs incurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 494 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159880</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, overturning the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court held that the exclusion of turnover value for the assessment year 1980-81 was justified as the transactions constituted second sales in the course of inter-State trade. Emphasizing the importance of the movement of goods across States, the Court clarified that the actual transfer of property need not occur in the same State. The petitioner&#039;s entitlement to exemption under section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act for the second sale was upheld, leading to the Tribunal&#039;s decision being set aside with no costs incurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>