<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 628 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159871</link>
    <description>A selling registered dealer is entitled to exemption in computing taxable turnover where the purchasing registered dealers furnish declarations in the prescribed form, and the taxing authority&#039;s scrutiny is limited to the genuineness of those declarations. It cannot reject valid declarations merely on a suspicion that the purchasers may have used the goods for some other purpose, absent material showing the forms were forged, fabricated, or otherwise invalid. A belated allegation of collusion was not accepted on the facts. The rejection of the declarations was therefore unjustified, the exemption was upheld, and the assessment and consequential penalty were quashed, with the matter remitted for fresh assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:09:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 628 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159871</link>
      <description>A selling registered dealer is entitled to exemption in computing taxable turnover where the purchasing registered dealers furnish declarations in the prescribed form, and the taxing authority&#039;s scrutiny is limited to the genuineness of those declarations. It cannot reject valid declarations merely on a suspicion that the purchasers may have used the goods for some other purpose, absent material showing the forms were forged, fabricated, or otherwise invalid. A belated allegation of collusion was not accepted on the facts. The rejection of the declarations was therefore unjustified, the exemption was upheld, and the assessment and consequential penalty were quashed, with the matter remitted for fresh assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>