<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159869</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the revision petitions, setting aside the tax levy on goods despatched to the Thane godown but upholding the tax liability for goods sent to Berlia Chemicals. The Court emphasized the burden of proof on authorities to establish sale transactions conclusively and directed the assessing officer to compute turnover for goods despatched to Berlia Chemicals, holding the assessee liable for Central sales tax on that turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 15:03:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159869</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the revision petitions, setting aside the tax levy on goods despatched to the Thane godown but upholding the tax liability for goods sent to Berlia Chemicals. The Court emphasized the burden of proof on authorities to establish sale transactions conclusively and directed the assessing officer to compute turnover for goods despatched to Berlia Chemicals, holding the assessee liable for Central sales tax on that turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>