https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159861 Availability of an alternative statutory remedy did not by itself bar writ jurisdiction, because judicial review remains open where there is lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, violation of fundamental rights, or challenge to vires; the writ petition was therefore maintainable. The disciplinary action was not shown to be mala fide, as partial exoneration and proved misconduct negatived bias, and the suspension was treated as pending enquiry under the employer's rules rather than a penalty under the Factories Rules. Dismissal for proved abusive and threatening conduct toward a superior was not shockingly disproportionate, so interference with the punishment was unwarranted. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jun 2014 13:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159861 Availability of an alternative statutory remedy did not by itself bar writ jurisdiction, because judicial review remains open where there is lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, violation of fundamental rights, or challenge to vires; the writ petition was therefore maintainable. The disciplinary action was not shown to be mala fide, as partial exoneration and proved misconduct negatived bias, and the suspension was treated as pending enquiry under the employer's rules rather than a penalty under the Factories Rules. Dismissal for proved abusive and threatening conduct toward a superior was not shockingly disproportionate, so interference with the punishment was unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159861