<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 586 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159857</link>
    <description>Seizure of books and records under section 59(4) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act is valid only when the Commissioner records a bona fide belief, based on material, that the dealer has evaded or attempted to evade tax; a mere audit objection or proposed reclassification is insufficient, so the seizure was without jurisdiction. Reassessment under section 44 likewise requires the assessing authority&#039;s own reason to believe, founded on relevant material, that turnover has escaped assessment or been under-assessed; reopening based only on external audit pressure and without fresh material was unsustainable. For the earlier years, the reassessment notices were also issued beyond the applicable five-year limit, making them time-barred and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 12:36:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 586 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159857</link>
      <description>Seizure of books and records under section 59(4) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act is valid only when the Commissioner records a bona fide belief, based on material, that the dealer has evaded or attempted to evade tax; a mere audit objection or proposed reclassification is insufficient, so the seizure was without jurisdiction. Reassessment under section 44 likewise requires the assessing authority&#039;s own reason to believe, founded on relevant material, that turnover has escaped assessment or been under-assessed; reopening based only on external audit pressure and without fresh material was unsustainable. For the earlier years, the reassessment notices were also issued beyond the applicable five-year limit, making them time-barred and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>