<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>A discussion on D. C. I. T., Kolkata Versus M/s. Haldia Riverside Estates Ltd. 2013 (5) TMI 254 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5373</link>
    <description>A statutory standard deduction for income from house property is computed as a percentage of annual value to cover upkeep, repairs, rent collection and administration and is distinct from depreciation, which is allowable on the cost of the building. The article argues the statutory deduction cannot be treated as inclusive of depreciation, criticises the fixed percentage for mismeasuring real income when actual expenses vary, and recommends allowing actual expenses and depreciation to better reflect economic income, noting that the Haldia Riverside decision treating the deduction as excluding separate depreciation merits reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:47:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>A discussion on D. C. I. T., Kolkata Versus M/s. Haldia Riverside Estates Ltd. 2013 (5) TMI 254 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5373</link>
      <description>A statutory standard deduction for income from house property is computed as a percentage of annual value to cover upkeep, repairs, rent collection and administration and is distinct from depreciation, which is allowable on the cost of the building. The article argues the statutory deduction cannot be treated as inclusive of depreciation, criticises the fixed percentage for mismeasuring real income when actual expenses vary, and recommends allowing actual expenses and depreciation to better reflect economic income, noting that the Haldia Riverside decision treating the deduction as excluding separate depreciation merits reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:47:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=5373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>