<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 58 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal provided relief to the assessees on various grounds. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify certain issues, such as the declaration of commission as salary income, the business purpose of interest on borrowed capital, and the nature of undisclosed investments. Additionally, it allowed certain claims based on legal precedents, such as the treatment of advances for business purposes as not constituting deemed dividends.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 58 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal provided relief to the assessees on various grounds. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify certain issues, such as the declaration of commission as salary income, the business purpose of interest on borrowed capital, and the nature of undisclosed investments. Additionally, it allowed certain claims based on legal precedents, such as the treatment of advances for business purposes as not constituting deemed dividends.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>