<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 614 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159847</link>
    <description>The Court partially allowed the tax revision case, remitting the matter to the Appellate Tribunal for a reevaluation of the addition to the taxable turnover. The Court emphasized the importance of providing cogent reasons for differing from lower authorities and highlighted the need for the Tribunal to address and provide reasons for disagreeing with the first appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:13:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 614 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159847</link>
      <description>The Court partially allowed the tax revision case, remitting the matter to the Appellate Tribunal for a reevaluation of the addition to the taxable turnover. The Court emphasized the importance of providing cogent reasons for differing from lower authorities and highlighted the need for the Tribunal to address and provide reasons for disagreeing with the first appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>