<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 503 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159834</link>
    <description>Goods classified under Schedule IV required a permit for importation into West Bengal; seizure of the consignment was therefore upheld as valid because import without the requisite permit was unlawful. The earlier unobjected imports did not invalidate the seizure once the classification issue had already been settled. On penalty, the assessee&#039;s bona fide misconception and the first-time nature of the violation were relevant to quantum, even though ignorance of law did not excuse the contravention. The maximum penalty was found harsh and was reduced, with the levy fixed at Rs. 30,000 on equitable considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 503 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159834</link>
      <description>Goods classified under Schedule IV required a permit for importation into West Bengal; seizure of the consignment was therefore upheld as valid because import without the requisite permit was unlawful. The earlier unobjected imports did not invalidate the seizure once the classification issue had already been settled. On penalty, the assessee&#039;s bona fide misconception and the first-time nature of the violation were relevant to quantum, even though ignorance of law did not excuse the contravention. The maximum penalty was found harsh and was reduced, with the levy fixed at Rs. 30,000 on equitable considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>