<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 516 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159827</link>
    <description>An eligible industrial unit under the Rajasthan Sales Tax exemption scheme could voluntarily forgo or partly avail the concessional benefit on specific sales, because the exemption limit operated as a maximum concession and not a compulsory minimum. Tax collected at the concessional rate on sales to the Rajasthan State Electricity Board, and deposited with the Government, was not unauthorised within the scheme, so forfeiture and penalty were not attracted. Rectification under section 17 was limited to an error apparent from the record and could not be used to reopen a debatable interpretation of the exemption scheme. The section 17 notices and resulting proceedings were therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 516 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159827</link>
      <description>An eligible industrial unit under the Rajasthan Sales Tax exemption scheme could voluntarily forgo or partly avail the concessional benefit on specific sales, because the exemption limit operated as a maximum concession and not a compulsory minimum. Tax collected at the concessional rate on sales to the Rajasthan State Electricity Board, and deposited with the Government, was not unauthorised within the scheme, so forfeiture and penalty were not attracted. Rectification under section 17 was limited to an error apparent from the record and could not be used to reopen a debatable interpretation of the exemption scheme. The section 17 notices and resulting proceedings were therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>