<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 561 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159800</link>
    <description>Green tea leaves were held not to fall within the expression &quot;flowers and plants&quot; in entry 47 of the First Schedule to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, because undefined fiscal words must be understood in trade and common parlance, not in a broad botanical sense. The exemption claim therefore failed, as tea leaves retained a distinct identity in the tea trade and the Schedule separately dealt with parts of plants in specific entries. The delayed return and non-payment of tax also attracted penalty and interest, since no sufficient justification for the delay was shown and a bona fide belief did not displace the statutory liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:54:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 561 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159800</link>
      <description>Green tea leaves were held not to fall within the expression &quot;flowers and plants&quot; in entry 47 of the First Schedule to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, because undefined fiscal words must be understood in trade and common parlance, not in a broad botanical sense. The exemption claim therefore failed, as tea leaves retained a distinct identity in the tea trade and the Schedule separately dealt with parts of plants in specific entries. The delayed return and non-payment of tax also attracted penalty and interest, since no sufficient justification for the delay was shown and a bona fide belief did not displace the statutory liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>