<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 626 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159795</link>
    <description>Electrical and electronic goods, including computers, could not be brought to entry tax as &quot;machinery (all kinds)&quot; for 1 April 1994 to 31 March 1997 because the operative notification during that period covered only machinery and did not specifically include that category. The earlier notification including electrical and electronic goods had been rescinded, and the later notification restoring that category took effect only on 31 March 1997. Applying the rule that a special provision prevails over a general one, the Court treated electrical and electronic goods as a distinct taxable category and held that a general machinery entry could not substitute for the missing notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 626 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159795</link>
      <description>Electrical and electronic goods, including computers, could not be brought to entry tax as &quot;machinery (all kinds)&quot; for 1 April 1994 to 31 March 1997 because the operative notification during that period covered only machinery and did not specifically include that category. The earlier notification including electrical and electronic goods had been rescinded, and the later notification restoring that category took effect only on 31 March 1997. Applying the rule that a special provision prevails over a general one, the Court treated electrical and electronic goods as a distinct taxable category and held that a general machinery entry could not substitute for the missing notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>