<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (6) TMI 350 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159789</link>
    <description>Section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act operates as an independent penal mechanism and does not depend on completion of assessment. Where the authorities examined recovered records, books of account, discrepancies in sales and purchases, and the dealer&#039;s explanation, and recorded concurrent findings of deliberate suppression and contumacious conduct, the penalty was sustained. The Kerala High Court reiterated that writ interference under Article 226 is unwarranted when such findings are supported by material and are neither arbitrary nor perverse. On that basis, the penalty remained upheld and no interference was called for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (6) TMI 350 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159789</link>
      <description>Section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act operates as an independent penal mechanism and does not depend on completion of assessment. Where the authorities examined recovered records, books of account, discrepancies in sales and purchases, and the dealer&#039;s explanation, and recorded concurrent findings of deliberate suppression and contumacious conduct, the penalty was sustained. The Kerala High Court reiterated that writ interference under Article 226 is unwarranted when such findings are supported by material and are neither arbitrary nor perverse. On that basis, the penalty remained upheld and no interference was called for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>