<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (5) TMI 390 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159786</link>
    <description>A demand notice under section 11(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 is defective if it fixes a payment date earlier than thirty days after service, because the statutory time requirement is mandatory. The defect invalidates the notice and requires a fresh notice, but it does not invalidate the assessment order or, by itself, the appeal or revision. The revisional authority also has wide power to grant a further opportunity where the assessee was not effectively able to produce supporting books and documents; in such circumstances, fairness may justify remand for fresh hearing. The matter was sent back for reconsideration after hearing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:17:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (5) TMI 390 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159786</link>
      <description>A demand notice under section 11(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 is defective if it fixes a payment date earlier than thirty days after service, because the statutory time requirement is mandatory. The defect invalidates the notice and requires a fresh notice, but it does not invalidate the assessment order or, by itself, the appeal or revision. The revisional authority also has wide power to grant a further opportunity where the assessee was not effectively able to produce supporting books and documents; in such circumstances, fairness may justify remand for fresh hearing. The matter was sent back for reconsideration after hearing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>