<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 35 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240370</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD overturned the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 for importing prohibited goods. The Tribunal found no deliberate intention on the appellant&#039;s part to import the prohibited goods, considering the circumstances and the lack of mis-declaration. Relying on a precedent from a related case, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unwarranted and set it aside, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 20:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 35 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240370</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD overturned the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 for importing prohibited goods. The Tribunal found no deliberate intention on the appellant&#039;s part to import the prohibited goods, considering the circumstances and the lack of mis-declaration. Relying on a precedent from a related case, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unwarranted and set it aside, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>