<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 29 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240364</link>
    <description>Exemption notification for small-scale clearances was interpreted as a whole, with Explanation VI excluding captive clearances of specified inputs used within the factory for manufacture of specified goods from the aggregate value of clearances. On that reading, parts of wick stoves captively consumed in making wick stoves were not to be added to turnover for denial of the exemption, because both the inputs and the final products fell within the notified specified goods. The resulting duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 29 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240364</link>
      <description>Exemption notification for small-scale clearances was interpreted as a whole, with Explanation VI excluding captive clearances of specified inputs used within the factory for manufacture of specified goods from the aggregate value of clearances. On that reading, parts of wick stoves captively consumed in making wick stoves were not to be added to turnover for denial of the exemption, because both the inputs and the final products fell within the notified specified goods. The resulting duty demand was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>