<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 25 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act in a case concerning the interpretation of Notification 39/2007-CE(NT). The dispute revolved around the calculation method of duty on capital goods cleared from the factory, with the appellants following a quarterly basis and the Revenue advocating for actual days. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing adherence to notification provisions and the absence of intent to evade payment as crucial in penalty imposition decisions under the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 25 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act in a case concerning the interpretation of Notification 39/2007-CE(NT). The dispute revolved around the calculation method of duty on capital goods cleared from the factory, with the appellants following a quarterly basis and the Revenue advocating for actual days. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing adherence to notification provisions and the absence of intent to evade payment as crucial in penalty imposition decisions under the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>