<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 22 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240357</link>
    <description>An appellate order passed without notice or hearing to the assessee cannot be sustained where principles of natural justice are not observed. The text also highlights that contradictory findings in connected appeals arising from the same adjudication, especially on confiscation and penalty, create inconsistency requiring correction. Because the departmental appeal was decided by modifying the adjudication order while the assessee&#039;s connected appeal was dealt with differently on the same issues, both appellate orders were set aside and the matters remanded for fresh adjudication after affording due opportunity of hearing to both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 20:25:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 22 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240357</link>
      <description>An appellate order passed without notice or hearing to the assessee cannot be sustained where principles of natural justice are not observed. The text also highlights that contradictory findings in connected appeals arising from the same adjudication, especially on confiscation and penalty, create inconsistency requiring correction. Because the departmental appeal was decided by modifying the adjudication order while the assessee&#039;s connected appeal was dealt with differently on the same issues, both appellate orders were set aside and the matters remanded for fresh adjudication after affording due opportunity of hearing to both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>