<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 8 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the service income earned by the assessee-Company in India should not be excluded by 90% while computing eligible profits under Section 80HHE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Authority and Tribunal both agreed that the service income was an integral part of the business profits and not akin to brokerage, commission, interest, rent, or charges. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the service income did not fall under the category of receipts that should be excluded by 90%, disposing of the appeal with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 20:24:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 8 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the service income earned by the assessee-Company in India should not be excluded by 90% while computing eligible profits under Section 80HHE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Authority and Tribunal both agreed that the service income was an integral part of the business profits and not akin to brokerage, commission, interest, rent, or charges. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the service income did not fall under the category of receipts that should be excluded by 90%, disposing of the appeal with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>