<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 501 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159774</link>
    <description>The High Court held that in cases of amalgamation with a specified transfer date, the amalgamation takes effect from that date. As the transferor-company ceased to exist post-amalgamation, a disputed transaction was not considered a sale subject to tax. The court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing adherence to the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent on the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 501 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159774</link>
      <description>The High Court held that in cases of amalgamation with a specified transfer date, the amalgamation takes effect from that date. As the transferor-company ceased to exist post-amalgamation, a disputed transaction was not considered a sale subject to tax. The court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing adherence to the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent on the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>