<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 620 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159759</link>
    <description>Interest on differential sales tax arising from final billing was held not leviable where the tax was collected at the time of final bills, deposited promptly with revised returns, and the record showed no unpaid tax retained from provisional bills or any intention to evade payment. The operative principle is that interest cannot be imposed merely because the final tax differs from the provisional amount when the liability is discharged soon after crystallisation and no avoidance element is established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 620 - RAJASTHAN TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159759</link>
      <description>Interest on differential sales tax arising from final billing was held not leviable where the tax was collected at the time of final bills, deposited promptly with revised returns, and the record showed no unpaid tax retained from provisional bills or any intention to evade payment. The operative principle is that interest cannot be imposed merely because the final tax differs from the provisional amount when the liability is discharged soon after crystallisation and no avoidance element is established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>