<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 517 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159755</link>
    <description>Coal-ash was treated as a distinct commercial commodity from coal because the coal entry covered coal including coke in all its forms, not the burnt residue left after use as fuel; the India Carbon Ltd. decision was held inapplicable on that basis. The exemption for products of specified industrial units did not extend to coal-ash because it was only residue generated in the manufacturing process and not one of the unit&#039;s manufactured products. Debarked eucalyptus and casuarina wood purchased from unregistered dealers were assessed as unclassified goods under section 6-A since there was no proof that the goods were firewood, and the factual finding that they were raw material for manufacture was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:55:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 517 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159755</link>
      <description>Coal-ash was treated as a distinct commercial commodity from coal because the coal entry covered coal including coke in all its forms, not the burnt residue left after use as fuel; the India Carbon Ltd. decision was held inapplicable on that basis. The exemption for products of specified industrial units did not extend to coal-ash because it was only residue generated in the manufacturing process and not one of the unit&#039;s manufactured products. Debarked eucalyptus and casuarina wood purchased from unregistered dealers were assessed as unclassified goods under section 6-A since there was no proof that the goods were firewood, and the factual finding that they were raw material for manufacture was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>