<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 582 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159752</link>
    <description>A sales tax exemption that confined relief to poultry feed made from ingredients already taxed or exempt within the State, while excluding feed made from ingredients imported from other States, was held to create an unjustified distinction under Part XIII of the Constitution. The Court applied the principle that tax differentiation affecting inter-State trade must rest on a valid, rational and disclosed basis, and found no justification for preferring locally sourced inputs. The notification was therefore unconstitutional for violating articles 301 to 304(a), and the assessee was entitled to the exemption for poultry feed manufactured from out-of-State ingredients.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:28:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 582 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159752</link>
      <description>A sales tax exemption that confined relief to poultry feed made from ingredients already taxed or exempt within the State, while excluding feed made from ingredients imported from other States, was held to create an unjustified distinction under Part XIII of the Constitution. The Court applied the principle that tax differentiation affecting inter-State trade must rest on a valid, rational and disclosed basis, and found no justification for preferring locally sourced inputs. The notification was therefore unconstitutional for violating articles 301 to 304(a), and the assessee was entitled to the exemption for poultry feed manufactured from out-of-State ingredients.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>