<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 552 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159748</link>
    <description>Voluntary compounding of alleged sales tax offences binds the dealer to the admission implicit in the offer, so the dealer cannot later challenge the composition order or seek refund in writ jurisdiction unless consent was legally defective or the amount exceeded the statutory ceiling. Where prior notice of the alleged violations and proposed action has already been received, no further notice is required before accepting the compounding offer unless a higher amount is proposed. Under section 31, composition could extend up to double the tax evaded or Rs. 1,000, whichever was greater, and the amount collected here remained within that limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:13:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 552 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159748</link>
      <description>Voluntary compounding of alleged sales tax offences binds the dealer to the admission implicit in the offer, so the dealer cannot later challenge the composition order or seek refund in writ jurisdiction unless consent was legally defective or the amount exceeded the statutory ceiling. Where prior notice of the alleged violations and proposed action has already been received, no further notice is required before accepting the compounding offer unless a higher amount is proposed. Under section 31, composition could extend up to double the tax evaded or Rs. 1,000, whichever was greater, and the amount collected here remained within that limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>