<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 483 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159727</link>
    <description>Broken rice, husk and rice bran obtained during milling of paddy were not includible in turnover where the agreement fixed remuneration only at a stated rate per quintal and treated the by-products as the agent&#039;s property. The clause on sales tax for the by-products did not, by itself, establish a sale, because a taxable sale requires transfer of property in goods for cash, deferred payment, or other valuable consideration. As the agreement did not show that the by-products were transferred as part of milling charges or any other consideration, the inference of sale to the millers was unsustainable and the assessment was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 483 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159727</link>
      <description>Broken rice, husk and rice bran obtained during milling of paddy were not includible in turnover where the agreement fixed remuneration only at a stated rate per quintal and treated the by-products as the agent&#039;s property. The clause on sales tax for the by-products did not, by itself, establish a sale, because a taxable sale requires transfer of property in goods for cash, deferred payment, or other valuable consideration. As the agreement did not show that the by-products were transferred as part of milling charges or any other consideration, the inference of sale to the millers was unsustainable and the assessment was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>