<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1508 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240331</link>
    <description>An assessee qualified for exemption under Section 4-A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 because the term-loan application was made before the cut-off date. The court accepted the 5.1.2000 application as the relevant request for financial assistance, and treated the later 1.5.2000 application as a separate filing by the proprietor in an individual capacity, not by the firm. The bank certificate corroborated the earlier application, and there was no evidence to disprove it. Rejection based on the absence of a dispatch number or non-mention in the exemption application was held unsustainable because such detail was not required and the certificate was not shown to be false.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1508 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240331</link>
      <description>An assessee qualified for exemption under Section 4-A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 because the term-loan application was made before the cut-off date. The court accepted the 5.1.2000 application as the relevant request for financial assistance, and treated the later 1.5.2000 application as a separate filing by the proprietor in an individual capacity, not by the firm. The bank certificate corroborated the earlier application, and there was no evidence to disprove it. Rejection based on the absence of a dispatch number or non-mention in the exemption application was held unsustainable because such detail was not required and the certificate was not shown to be false.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>