<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1493 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240316</link>
    <description>In block assessment proceedings, additions based on search-linked purchase bills, bank trail, post-search enquiries and third-party statements may not be deleted merely because the Tribunal treats the evidence in isolation; corroborative material and the surrounding factual matrix must be considered, and the effect of any refusal of cross-examination must be assessed in context. The High Court also noted that the Tribunal failed to deal with all material Revenue grounds, including the deduction-related objection and connected computation issues. The incomplete adjudication warranted setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order to that extent and remand for fresh decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1493 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240316</link>
      <description>In block assessment proceedings, additions based on search-linked purchase bills, bank trail, post-search enquiries and third-party statements may not be deleted merely because the Tribunal treats the evidence in isolation; corroborative material and the surrounding factual matrix must be considered, and the effect of any refusal of cross-examination must be assessed in context. The High Court also noted that the Tribunal failed to deal with all material Revenue grounds, including the deduction-related objection and connected computation issues. The incomplete adjudication warranted setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order to that extent and remand for fresh decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>