<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1484 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240307</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remitting certain issues back to the AO for further examination. The additions to income were deleted for discrepancies in receipts, disallowed TDS, cash introduction in capital, and low household drawings. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the issue of low household drawings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=337665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1484 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240307</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remitting certain issues back to the AO for further examination. The additions to income were deleted for discrepancies in receipts, disallowed TDS, cash introduction in capital, and low household drawings. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the issue of low household drawings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=240307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>